CHICAGO MARATHON · 2026 EDITION

Find your Chicago Marathon result.

Look up your name or bib for rankings, percentiles and a closer look at your splits.

Loading the official finishers…
01 / THE FIELD

See how you placed

Your overall, gender and age-group standings, with percentiles and median finish times.

02 / YOUR SPLITS

Understand your pacing

Compare with a finish target and see how your second half held up against the field.

03 / THE WEATHER

Try a cooler Chicago

A weather-based finish estimate, using temperatures during your race.

Or browse all results
ABOUT THE DATA

Sources and calculations

Independent analysis of the organizer’s published results.

Source: official Chicago Marathon results
Why Yellow Alert?

A nod to the heat and the flags runners remember. In Chicago’s Event Alert System, yellow means moderate risk and less-than-ideal conditions. This is a name for a post-race report, not a live alert or an official race service.

Where do the rankings and percentiles come from?

We include finishers in the organizer’s Marathon runner result list, excluding separate wheelchair, handcycle and duo events. A finish-time rank is 1 + the number of runners with a strictly faster recorded finish. Equal times share a rank. “Top %” is rank ÷ group size × 100. “Peers behind you” is strictly slower finishers ÷ (group size − 1) × 100. Tied peers are not counted as slower. A group of one has no peer percentile.

The age group combines the runner’s listed gender and age division. Country means the source’s citizenship field, not residence. Organizer places can differ from finish-time ranks because of classification and timing rules. The field table preserves organizer overall places.

What can the split data tell me?

Half balance compares two equal 21.0975 km halves. The half comparison uses each finisher’s signed second-half time change: (second ÷ first − 1) × 100. The field reference is the median of those changes across all other finishers with valid halfway times. The expected second half is your first half × (1 + median change ÷ 100). The relative difference is (expected − actual second half) ÷ expected × 100. This compares pacing changes, not fitness or absolute speed. Positive means the second half took longer. The chart and table show all recorded timing mats. Segment pace is calculated between consecutive recorded mats; short segments can amplify timing or mat-position differences. Target comparisons assume an even pace across 42.195 km. Positive time differences mean behind target; negative differences mean ahead. No mile-by-mile pace or position changes are invented.

How current is this report?

Snapshot is loading. The organizer labels these results unofficial and may correct them. Search, field comparisons and half times use this snapshot. Detailed checkpoints may be fetched separately from the organizer. This site is not affiliated with the Chicago Marathon or its timing provider.